انطلاق خطة تنظيف بغداد من المليشيات والسلاح غير الشرعي
لقد سدت الحدود في اتجاه ايران وسوريا المشكوك فيهم كجيران السؤ ولاحظ العراقيون ان هذه الخطة ابتدات في شارع حيفا حيث بعض العناصر التابعة للمقاومة السنية والتي تعتبرها الحكومة ارهابية ثم انتقلت القوات العراقية والامريكية الى منطقة سنية اخرى الا وهي الاعظمية والتي لها نفس مواصفات شارع حيفا تقريبا والمعوف ان فرق الموت ومليشيا المهدي وبدر ذاق سكان بغداد منها الامرين وهي اخطر المليشيات الارهابية ومركزها مدينة الصدر فماذا يقول المواطن العراقي الشريف حول هذه الخطة؟؟؟
اما السيد بوش فقد صرح بما يلي
Speaking at a White House press conference, his first of 2007, Bush also said it was unclear whether top Iranian leaders played any role in funneling deadly new bombs into
Iraq that have been used to kill US soldiers there. As US and Iraqi troops launched a sweeping security operation in Baghdad, Bush defended the domestically unpopular plan and said Washington must back the fledgling Iraqi government's efforts to contain the violence.
"The fundamental question is, can we help this government have the security force level necessary to make sure that the ethnic cleansing that was taking place in certain neighborhoods is stopped?" he said.
But, he warned, "the operation to secure Baghdad is going to take time, and there will be violence."
"As we saw on our TV screens, the terrorists will send car bombs into crowded markets," the president said. "And I can understand why people are concerned when they turn on their TV screens and see this violence.
"But it reminds me of how important it is to help (the Iraqis) succeed," he said. "If you think the violence is bad now, imagine what it would look like if we don't help them secure the city, the capital city of Baghdad.
He defended his decision to send additional US troops to Iraq to secure Baghdad and criticized a proposed US congressional resolution denouncing the troop buildup.
"Later this week, the House of Representatives will vote on a resolution that opposes our new plan in Iraq before it has a chance to work," Bush said. "People are prejudging the outcome of this."
"We've weighed every option," he said. "And I concluded that to step back from the fight in Baghdad would have disastrous consequences for people in America."
Bush also stood by charges that the Al-Qods brigade of
Iran's Revolutionary Guard had provided explosives used against US troops in Iraq. "I can say with certainty that the Qods force, a part of the Iranian government, has provided these sophisticated IEDs that have harmed our troops," he said, referring to improvised explosive devices like roadside bombs.
"I do not know whether or not the Quds force was ordered from the top echelons of government," he said. "But my point is what's worse, them ordering it and it happening or them not ordering it and it's happening?"
Bush heralded a landmark deal aimed at halting Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program as a "good first step" but much would depend on the communist regime keeping its word.
"There is a lot of work to be done to make sure that the commitments made in this agreement become a reality."
"But I believe it's an important step in the right direction," he said of the agreement adopted at six-party talks in the Chinese capital this week.
Under the accord,
North Korea will be given 50,000 tonnes of fuel aid for closing their key Yongbyon nuclear facility north of Pyongyang and allowing UN nuclear inspectors back into the country. The United States, for its part, would begin the process of delisting the North as a sponsor of terrorism and normalizing relations with a country with which it is still technically at war.
Bush's press conference comes amid heated debate among lawmakers over the Democratic-sponsored resolution opposing his move to send additional combat troops to Iraq.
Bush announced plans in January to deploy an additional 21,500 US troops to Iraq, a move which has been overwhelmingly opposed by the US public and drawn denunciations from Democrats who now control the US Congress.
A USA Today newspaper poll on Tuesday found that nearly two-thirds of Americans -- 63 percent -- want US troops home from Iraq by the end of 2008.
The non-binding measure will likely come up for a vote in the House on Friday. Although symbolic, it would constitute the strongest criticism yet of Bush's policy in Iraq and pave the way for possible attempts to curtail funding for the war effort. Senate Democrats had tried to introduce a similar resolution opposing Bush's plan but Republicans blocked the bill from being debated last week